Material Degradation with Moisture Transport Mechanisms in Timber Bridge Decks: Finite Element Modeling

Authors

  • Simone Benedetti Department of Materials Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Pisa, Pisa, Tuscany, Italy Author

Keywords:

Timber Bridge Decks, Finite Element Modeling, Moisture Transport, Material Degradation, Structural Reliability

Abstract

The structural longevity of timber bridge decks is inherently governed by the complex interplay between environmental exposure and the fundamental hygroscopic nature of wood. Material degradation in these structures is rarely the result of immediate mechanical overload, but rather a progressive deterioration facilitated by long-term moisture transport mechanisms. This paper investigates the spatial and temporal distribution of moisture within timber bridge decks and evaluates the subsequent material degradation using advanced finite element modeling techniques. By simulating the anisotropic diffusion of water through the porous cellular network of the wood, the study captures the transient moisture gradients that develop under cyclic environmental loading. A coupled hygro-mechanical framework is employed to assess how localized elevations in moisture content initiate stiffness reduction and promote conditions conducive to biological decay. The computational results demonstrate that moisture accumulation is highly concentrated at connection points and interfacial gaps, creating persistent high-moisture zones that significantly accelerate localized degradation. The finite element modeling evidence underscores the necessity of considering non-Fickian diffusion characteristics and moisture-dependent mechanical properties in the structural assessment of timber bridges. These findings provide critical insights for optimizing preservation strategies, informing maintenance schedules, and enhancing the overall resilience and service life of sustainable timber infrastructure globally.

References

1. Bramwell, B.; Lane, B. Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. J. Sustain. Tour. 2011, 19, 411–421.

2. Gössling, S. Global environmental consequences of tourism. Glob. Environ. Change 2002, 12, 283–302.

3. Tao, J.; Xie, X.; Peng, R.; Bei, N. Digital Economy and Environmental Pollution in the Manufacturing Sector: Emission Reduction Effects and Mechanisms. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2024, 96, 103737.

4. Mitra, A.; Seetharaman, A.; Maddulety, K. A Structural Equation Model Study for Adoption of Internet of Things for the Growth of Manufacturing Industries in Australia. J. Compr. Bus. Adm. Res. 2024, 1, 93–104.

5. McMillan, M.; Rodrik, D. Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. J. Econ. Growth 2011, 16, 153–173.

6. The Nature Positive Platform (Nat5). Nat5 Santa Isabel Water Project; The Nature Positive Platform: London, UK, 2025; Available online: https://www.nat5.bio/collection/santa-isabel-water/ (accessed on 5 November 2025).

7. Revenues for Nature (N4N). Revenues for Nature Guidebook Series: Nature-Based Models for Unlocking Private Investment into Freshwater (Expanded Edition).

2025. Available online: https://hive.greenfinanceinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/R4N-GUIDEBOOKS-FRESHWATER-EXPANDED.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2025).

8. Han, J.; Jiang, R.Y.; Sun, Y.W. Digital Service Trade And Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Study Based on 50 Countries. J. Int. Bus. Econ. 2021, 6, 34–49. (In Chinese)

9. Barbier, E.B. Reform economics of managing global water supplies. Nature 2023, 617, 252.

10. Clarkson, P.M.; Li, Y.; Richardson, G.D.; Vasvari, F.P. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Account. Organ. Soc. 2008, 33, 303–327.

11. Teece, D.J. Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan. 2010, 43, 172–194.

12. Jiang, T. Mediating Effect and Moderating Effect in The Empirical Study of Causal Inference. China Ind. Econ. 2022, 5, 100–120. (In Chinese)

13. Nureen, N.; Nuţă, A.C. Envisioning the Invisible: Unleashing the Interplay Between Green Supply Chain Management and Green Human Resource Management: An Ability-Motivation-Opportunity Theory Perspective Towards Environmental Sustainability. J. Compr. Bus. Adm. Res. 2024, 1, 55–64.

14. Hoffman, D.L.; Novak, T.P. Consumer and object experience in the Internet of Things: An assemblage theory approach. J. Consum. Res. 2018, 44, 1178–1204.

15. Dasgupta, P. The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review; HM Treasury: London, UK, 2021. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/602e92b2e90e07660f807b47/The_Economics_of_Biodiversity_The_Dasgupta_Review_Full_Report.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2025).

16. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). The Share of Sustainable Wood: Data on FSC’s Presence in Global Wood Production. Forest Stewardship Council, 2018. Available online: https://fsc.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/Global%20Volume%20of%20FSC-certified%20Wood%20-July%202018.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2025).

17. McKinsey & Company. Where the World’s Largest Companies Stand on Nature; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/where-the-worlds-largest-companies-stand-on-nature (accessed on 5 November 2025).

18. Arsiso, B.K. Urban Land Cover Transformations and Thermal Dynamics through Integrated LULC, UHI, and Ecological Vulnerability Assessment Using Remote Sensing Indices in the City of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 135, 107017.

19. Sun, T.; Sun, B.; Xue, J. Research on Interactive Stress and Coupling Coordination between Urban-Rural Integration and Eco-environment of Urban Agglomerations in Yellow River Basin. J. North China Univ. Water Resour. Electr. Power (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2025, 46, 10–22.

20. Sun, C.; Ma, T.; Ouyang, X.; Wang, R. Does Service Trade Globalization Promote Trade and Low-Carbon Globalization? Evidence from 30 Countries. Emerg. Mark. Financ. Trade 2019, 57, 1455–1473.

21. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S. The Impacts of GDP, Trade Structure, Exchange Rate and FDI Inflows on China’s Carbon Emissions. Energy Policy 2018, 120, 347–353.

22. Acemoglu, D.; Aghion, P.; Bursztyn, L.; Hemous, D. The Environment and Directed Technical Change. Am. Econ. Rev. 2012, 102, 131–166.

23. Taskforce on Nature and Nature Finance (TNNF). Global Nature Markets Landscaping Study. Taskforce on Nature and Nature Finance.

2022. Available online: https://www.naturemarkets.net/publications/global-nature-markets-landscaping-study (accessed on 5 November 2025).

24. Aghion, P.; Howitt, P. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 1992, 60, 323–351.

25. Zhu, Q.; Peng, X.; Wu, K. Calculation and Decomposition Of Indirect Carbon Emissions from Residential Consumption in China Based on the Input–Output Model. Energy Policy 2012, 48, 618–626.

26. McKercher, B.; Lew, A.A. Tourist flows and spatial distribution of tourists. In A Companion to Tourism; Lew, A.A., Hall, C.M., Williams, A.M., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2004.

27. Hu, H.; Xie, N.; Fang, D.; Zhang, X. The role of renewable energy consumption and commercial services trade in carbon dioxide reduction: Evidence from 25 developing countries. Appl. Energy 2018, 211, 1229–1244.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

Issue

Section

Articles