Topology Optimization Designs and Buckling Resistance across Lightweight Lattice Structures

Authors

  • Phoebe Sze-Ling Wong Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Author

Keywords:

Topology Optimization, Lattice Structures, Buckling Resistance, Reliability Testing, Structural Reliability

Abstract

The transition towards lightweight structural materials in aerospace, automotive, and biomedical engineering has driven significant advancements in topology optimization and the implementation of lattice structures. While these cellular materials offer exceptional strength-to-weight ratios and energy absorption capabilities, their integration into safety-critical applications is frequently hindered by uncertainties regarding structural reliability and susceptibility to buckling under compressive loads. This paper provides a comprehensive academic investigation into the reliability testing of topology-optimized designs, specifically focusing on buckling resistance within lightweight lattice structures. Through rigorous computational methodologies, the study evaluates how manufacturing-induced defects and geometric variations impact the critical buckling loads of strut-based and surface-based lattice configurations. The research systematically isolates the parameters influencing structural instability, demonstrating that optimized topologies inherently possess varying degrees of sensitivity to localized geometric perturbations. A robust reliability analysis framework, integrating probabilistic modeling and deterministic finite element simulations, is presented to quantify the probabilistic margins of safety. The findings underscore the critical necessity of incorporating buckling constraints and defect-informed reliability metrics directly into the initial stages of topology optimization algorithms. This approach ensures that the resulting lightweight structures maintain theoretical efficiency while demonstrating practical resilience against sudden catastrophic failure modes typical of cellular instability.

References

1. EN 1992-1-1:2015; Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, Bridges and Civil Engineering Structures. European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2015.

2. ÖNORM EN 1990:2013; Eurocode—Basis of Structural Design. Austrian Standards: Vienna, Austria, 2013.

3. Rackwitz, R.; Flessler, B. Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput. Struct. 1978, 9, 489–494.

4. Ditlevsen, O.; Madsen, H.O. Structural Reliability Methods; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1996.

5. Tan, L.; Yu, X.; Wan, P.; Yang, K. Biodegradable Materials for Bone Repairs: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 503–513.

6. Xie, J.; Zhang, T.; Jiang, J.; Xue, W.; Wang, W.; Ni, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X. Advances in Magnesium-Based Implants for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review and Future Perspectives. J. Magnes. Alloys 2025, 13, 2978–3003.

7. Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Gong, H.; Tang, H.; Dong, G.; Wang, B.; Xia, H. A biomechanical study of a polymer material bundled rib fracture fixator. Technol. Health Care 2024, 32, 4681–4694.

8. Novák, D.; Rusina, R.; Vořechovský, M. FREeT: Feasible Reliability Engineering Tool, Version 1.7 2024; Červenka Consulting: Prague, Czechia, 2024. Available online: http://www.freet.cz (accessed on 25 March 2026).

9. Melchers, R.E.; Beck, A.T. Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018.

10. Schneider, J. Introduction to Safety and Reliability of Structures; IABSE: Zürich, Switzerland, 2006.

11. Goodno, B.J.; Gere, J.M. Mechanics of Materials, 9th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2018.

12. Elgohary, H.A. Comparative reliability analysis of punching shear design for edge column–flat slab connections without shear reinforcement. J. Umm Al-Qura Univ. Eng. Archit. 2025, 16, 682–693.

13. Kania, H.; Liberski, P. Synergistic influence of the addition of Al, Ni and Pb to a zinc bath upon growth kinetics and structure of coatings. Solid State Phenom. 2014, 212, 115–120.

14. Bull, S.J. Failure modes in scratch adhesion testing. Surf. Coat. Technol. 1991, 50, 25–32.

15. Feldt, L. S., & Kim, S. (2006). Testing the difference between two alpha coefficients with small samples of subjects and raters. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 589–600.

16. Liao, Q.; Yu, J.-T.; Su, Y.-R.; Chen, W.-G. Reliability-based design method for shear capacity of steel reinforced engineered cementitious composites (ECC) beams. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02681.

17. EN 1997-1; Eurocode 7: Geotechnical Design—Part 1: General Rules. European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2004.

18. Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Tang, H.; Zheng, M.; Ma, D.; Huang, J.; Li, W.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, Z.; Li, W.; et al. Effect of LIPUS on the Degradation Behavior of Magnesium Alloy Scaffolds for Bone Repair: Insights from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies. J. Magnes. Alloys 2025, 13, 4950–4965.

19. Rosch, D. M., Collier, D., & Thompson, S. E. (2015). An exploration of students’ motivation to lead: An analysis by race, gender, and student leadership behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 56(3), 286–291.

20. Kuklík, V.; Kudláček, J. 5—Morphology of hot-dip galvanized coatings. In Hot-Dip Galvanizing of Steel Structures; Butterworth-Heinemann: Waltham, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 41–65.

21. Dachasa, K.; Chuni Aklilu, T.; Gashaw Ewnete, B.; Mosisa Ejeta, B.; Fufa Bakare, F. Magnesium-Based Biodegradable Alloy Materials for Bone Healing Application. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2024, 2024, 1325004.

22. Thomas, K.K.; Zafar, M.N.; Pitt, W.G.; Husseini, G.A. Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys for Biomedical Implants: Properties, Challenges, and Surface Modifications with a Focus on Orthopedic Fixation Repair. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 10.

23. Strauss, A.; Frangopol, D.M.; Bergmeister, K. Assessment of existing structures based on identification. J. Struct. Eng. 2010, 136, 86–97.

24. Strauss, A.; Bergmeister, K.; Novák, D.; Lehký, D. Stochastische Parameteridentifikation bei Konstruktionsbeton für die Betonerhaltung. Beton-Und Stahlbetonbau 2004, 99, 967–974.

25. Finch, W. H., & French, B. F. (2018). A Simulation investigation of the performance of invariance assessment using equivalence testing procedures. Structural Equation Modeling, 25(5), 673–686.

26. Sales, J.R.; Ellis, T.J.; Gillard, J.; Liu, Q.; Chen, J.C.; Ham, B.; Mayberry, J.C. Biomechanical Testing of a Novel, Minimally Invasive Rib Fracture Plating System. J. Trauma 2008, 64, 1270–1274.

27. Pilkey, W.D.; Pilkey, D.F. Peterson’s Stress Concentration Factors, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008.

28. Vispoel, W. P., Hong, H., Lee, H., & Jorgensen, T. D. (2023). Analyzing complete generalizability theory designs using structural equation models. Applied Measurement in Education, 36(4), 372–393.

29. Liu, Z., Rattan, A., & Savani, K. (2023). Reducing gender bias in the evaluation and selection of future leaders: The role of decision-makers’ mindsets about the universality of leadership potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(12), 1924.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-23

Issue

Section

Articles